sustainability

A Step Toward Supply Chain Sustainability: The Round Table on Responsible Soy in Brazil, 2005 – 2017

Author
Blair Cameron
Focus Area(s)
Country of Reform
Abstract

In the early 2000s, deforestation accelerated in Brazil’s Amazon rainforest, and global environmental groups began to raise the alarm. Greenpeace, one of the most vocal groups, published a report that placed the blame partly on the soy industry, which had grown rapidly in Brazil, Argentina, and Paraguay. In response, industry representatives joined with nongovernmental organizations, financial institutions, supermarkets, and others in the soy supply chain to form the Roundtable on Responsible Soy (RTRS). Following the model of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil, which worked to transform the environmentally destructive palm oil industry in Southeast Asia, the RTRS wanted to implement a supply chain certification system to help identify whether harvests came from land deforested without regard for environmental impact and nudge soy farmers into a new era of sustainable production. The roundtable participants successfully developed a standard for responsible practices, and enrolled a number of large farm enterprises. But low demand for certified soy and the high cost of becoming certified slowed progress, especially among smaller producers. As of 2017, less than 1% of soy produced in Brazil was RTRS certified, and uncertified landholders continued to convert important natural ecosystems into soy farms. Although the RTRS succeeded in bringing together key players in the soy industry to talk about sustainability for the first time, it was clear that complementary efforts were necessary to shift the soy industry as a whole toward environmentally friendly production.

Blair Cameron drafted this case study based on interviews conducted in São Paulo, Cuiabá, and Brasilia, Brazil in March and April 2017. The British Academy-Department for International Development Anti-Corruption Evidence (ACE) Program funded the development of this case study. Case published August 2017.

 

 

Brewing a Sustainable Future: Certifying Kenya’s Smallholder Tea Farmers, 2007–2017

Author
Blair Cameron
Focus Area(s)
Country of Reform
Abstract

In 2007, multinational consumer goods company Unilever launched a partnership with the Kenya Tea Development Agency (KTDA) to help bring Kenya’s more than 500,000 small-scale tea farmers up to the certification standard set by the Sustainable Agriculture Network, a global coalition of environmental organizations. To participate, farmers had to fulfill dozens of criteria related to worker safety, environmental management, and agricultural practices. The KTDA, a private company that had been government run until 2000, was able to roll out certification quickly and on an unprecedented scale, thanks to its large market share, its rapport with farmers, the willingness of multinational companies to support high-quality sustainably grown tea, and funding by donor organizations. By mid 2016, all of Kenya’s smallholders had met certification standards, and Unilever’s flagship Lipton brand was selling 100%-certified tea. Soon after, other major global brands met the same target. Farmers pointed to increased yields, stronger health and safety procedures, and improved livelihoods as benefits of the certification initiative.

Blair Cameron drafted this case study based on interviews conducted in Kenya in January and February 2017. The British Academy-Department for International Development Anti-Corruption Evidence (ACE) Program funded the development of this case study. Case published May 2017.

Fernando Sampaio

Ref Batch
A
Ref Batch Number
8
Critical Tasks
Country of Reform
Interviewers
Blair Cameron
Name
Fernando Sampaio
Interviewee's Position
Executive Director
Interviewee's Organization
Brazilian Beef Association, GTPS
Language
English
Town/City
Sao Paulo
Country
Date of Interview
Reform Profile
No
Abstract

In this interview, Fernando Sampaio discusses the evolution of the Brazilian beef industry and the widening application of sustainability initiatives. He recounts how the dominant Brazilian meat packers emerged from a land occupation movement and grew with increased government investment in the 1960s. Sampaio also emphasizes that traceability has been an issue in the industry since the 2000s due to the outbreak of foot and mouth disease and bovine spongiform encephalopathy, commonly known as mad cow disease. He explains the role of the Animal Transit Guide in addressing the problem and anticipates that the implementation of the Agricultural and Livestock Management Platform, a newly integrated database, will further improve transparency. Sampaio then reflects on the impact of the Brazilian Roundtable on Sustainable Livestock, the “Slaughtering the Amazon” campaign by Greenpeace, and the consequent lawsuit against meat packers in 2009. Finally, he reviews the challenges associated with improving transparency and sustainability, from increasing communication between the public and private sector to enforcing compliance with the forest code.

Profile

At the time of the interview, Fernando Sampaio was leaving his position as the executive director of the Association of Brazilian Beef Exporters to become the director of the “Produce, Conserve, and Include” strategy committee in the state of Mato Grosso. Before leading the beef exporters’ group, Sampaio worked for Zandbergen, a Dutch beef distributor, from 2001 to 2008. He also worked in the French beef industry for a short time before moving to the Netherlands. He received a bachelor’s degree in agronomic engineering in 1997 from the Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, a unit of the University of São Paulo.

Full Audio File Size
99 MB
Full Audio Title
Fernando Sampaio Interview

A Drive to Protect Forests: Introducing Sustainable Cattle Certification in Brazil, 2009-2016

Author
Blair Cameron
Focus Area(s)
Critical Tasks
Country of Reform
Abstract

In 2009, after environmental action group Greenpeace labeled cattle ranching in Brazil as the biggest cause of deforestation worldwide, the country’s giant beef industry got on the defensive. For many years, ranchers and land speculators had illegally cleared the Amazon rain forest and other important ecosystems to satisfy demand for beef. Amid calls for change, the Sustainable Agriculture Network, a global alliance of environmental organizations, created a certification system designed to encourage the adoption of sustainable ranching practices and foster a market for forest-friendly beef and leather products. After some early success—getting certified beef onto the shelves of a major supermarket chain—the initiative stalled. Few consumers and corporations cared about where the beef they bought came from, and ranchers were reluctant to change their ways in the absence of significant financial incentives. By late 2016, only a handful of ranchers, whose combined holdings represented a tiny fraction of 1% of Brazil’s pastureland, had received certification. However, the program succeeded in developing niche markets for certified beef, and proponents expressed hopes for more gains as consumers became more interested in the sustainability of food production.

Blair Cameron drafted this case study based on interviews conducted in São Paulo, in August and September 2016. The British Academy-Department for International Development Anti- Corruption Evidence (ACE) Progamme funded the development of this case study. Case published November 2016.

Juan Miguel Luz

Ref Batch
ZC
Focus Area(s)
Ref Batch Number
3
Country of Reform
Interviewers
Rushda Majeed
Name
Juan Miguel Luz
Interviewee's Position
Associate Dean
Interviewee's Organization
Asian Institute of Management
Language
English
Nationality of Interviewee
Philippines
Place (Building/Street)
Asian Institute of Management
Town/City
Makati City
Country
Date of Interview
Reform Profile
No
Abstract
Juan Miguel Luz describes his involvement with the conception and execution of the Textbook Count Project as a senior official in the Philippine Department of Education. Beginning with a description of the problems with the department prior to his appointment, Luz outlines how corrupt department officials awarded textbook contracts to favored, often unqualified publishers, and further critiques the poor controls on textbook quality and delivery at the time. He describes the steps taken under Textbook Count One, Two, and Three to overhaul the bidding, production, and nationwide delivery of textbooks, emphasizing the importance of relying on non-governmental organizations such as Government Watch, the National Citizens Movement for Free Elections, and even the Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts in inspecting the quality and quantity of books delivered. Luz describes the success of the project, supported by the World Bank, in reducing the cost of textbooks, establishing stringent quality controls, and ensuring the timely delivery of needed textbooks to public schools all across the country. Providing numerous examples of corruption, Luz offers valuable insights into the challenges of monitoring services and holding both suppliers and civil servants accountable.
 
Profile

At the time of this interview, Juan Miguel Luz was serving as an associate dean of the Center for Development Management (CDM) at the Asian Institute of Management (AIM). Earlier on, from 1997-2005, he was a member of the business and development management faculty at AIM, and also served as the managing director of the AIM Center for Corporate Responsibility from 1999-2002. In 2002, he entered public service as undersecretary of the Philippine Department of Education, where he was in charge of finance and administration. He held this position until 2006, and during his tenure, was part of significant reform within the department, including the numerous Textbook Count projects that helped improve the quality and availability of textbooks to local schools. From 2006-2008, Luz served as president of the International Institute for Rural Reconstruction, an international NGO with programs in Southeast Asia and East Africa. He rejoined AIM in September 2009, and remains actively involved with a number of non-profit organizations, including the Knowledge Channel, the Philippine Center for Population Development, and Philippine Business for Education. He has also authored books on the strategic management of non-governmental organizations, corporate-community relations and education management. 

Full Audio File Size
140 MB
Full Audio Title
Juan Miguel Luz Interview

Promoting Accountability, Monitoring Services: Textbook Procurement and Delivery, The Philippines, 2002-2005

Author
Rushda Majeed
Focus Area(s)
Country of Reform
Abstract
From 2002 to 2005, Juan Miguel Luz, a senior official at the Department of Education of the Philippines, led a nationwide drive to ensure timely procurement and delivery of textbooks to the country’s 40,000 public schools. Before Luz took office, corrupt department officials awarded textbook contracts to favored, and often unqualified, publishers. Because of weak quality controls, books had poor binding, printing defects and missing pages. Without a fixed schedule, publishers sometimes delivered textbooks several months after the start of the school year or failed to deliver them. The entire cycle from procurement to delivery could take as long as two years, twice the specified time span. Soon after taking office, Luz initiated the Textbook Count project to overhaul the procurement and delivery process. He partnered with nongovernmental organizations to monitor the department’s bidding process, inspect the quality of textbooks, and track deliveries. Groups such as Government Watch, the National Citizens' Movement for Free Elections, and even the Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts mobilized thousands of volunteers to help track textbook deliveries to public schools. And Coca-Cola Company used its delivery trucks to transport textbooks to schools in far-flung areas of the country. By 2005, textbook prices had fallen by 50%, binding and printing quality had improved, and volunteer observers reported 95% error-free deliveries. The case offers insights into the challenges of monitoring services and holding civil servants and suppliers accountable.
 
Rushda Majeed drafted this case study based on interviews conducted in Manila, Philippines, in March 2011. She added an epilogue based on interviews conducted in Manila in February and March 2013. Case republished July 2013
 
Associated Interview(s): Juan Miguel Luz